Environmentalists demand $200M be spent on voter concerns

TALLAHASSEE -- For environmentalists, the upcoming legislative session is a chance to set things right.

At the annual meeting of the Everglades Coalition this week in Coral Gables, the groups vowed not to let Florida legislators again botch efforts to implement a constitutional amendment voters overwhelmingly backed in 2014. It sets aside a third of taxes from real estate deals to buy, restore and manage lands to protect water supplies and wildlife. If all goes as planned, the session should end with 25 percent of the money, or at least $200 million, spent on Everglades projects.

"The challenge has always been, 'Show me the money.' But voters have stood up and said now we're going to put money aside for all our natural resources," Eric Eikenberg, executive director of the Everglades Foundation, told a crowded ballroom at the Biltmore Hotel in an opening session Friday to the three-day event.

For years, the multibillion-dollar effort to restore the Everglades has stalled, bogged down in bureaucracy and fights over funding. Just this week, officials celebrated the groundbreaking on a Miami-Dade project along the C-111 canal authorized more than a decade ago. Congress has still not funded an attempt to speed up work in the central Everglades to

get water moving into ailing Florida Bay, which suffered a massive seagrass die-off last summer and fall.

Voters responded to that frustration by embracing the constitutional measure. About 75 percent backed it. But when it came time to spending the money last year, legislators instead used about two-thirds of the money on other expenses including buying cars and paying off other debts.

"What was done with Amendment 1 wasn't just a failure to implement it. It was a blatant failure," said Miami state Rep. Jose Javier Rodriguez, the only Democrat on the Republican-sponsored bill, which proposes setting aside $100 million annually to focus on central Everglades projects in the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan.

The biggest hurdle, Rodriguez said, was convincing the Republican-controlled Legislature to agree to buy land.

"We really have to focus on that gut level ideological resistance," he said. "It's there. It's palpable."

Legislators are also under threat of legal action. After they failed to spend money, four groups -- the Florida Wildlife Federation, St. Johns Riverkeeper, the Environmental Confederation of Southwest Florida and the Sierra Club -- sued, demanding a judge declare the money illegally spent and return it to the trust fund.

"It was an extraordinary abuse of power," said Earthjustice attorney David Guest, who is representing the groups.

If legislators fail to act, environmentalists are also betting on a surprising ally: Gov. Rick Scott.

Drew Bartlett, deputy secretary of the Department of Environmental Protection, told the group that Scott -- who has been widely criticized for downsizing the agency, slashing its budget and most recently for a plan to open state parks to hunting, cattle grazing and timber harvesting -- has vowed to set aside $5 billion in Amendment 1 money over 20 years to that would help create the water storage to restore parched marshes.

"The big legacy is getting the dedicated funding stream," Bartlett said.

With a set amount of money, environmentalists say restoration work should show more improvements to the marshes.

"If you looked at projects that were anticipated to be completed, you would be discouraged that we are not as far along as we'd hoped. That translates to real damage in the estuaries and seagrass die-offs in Florida Bay. The water isn't getting where it's supposed to go and that was really the promise of Everglades restoration," said Dawn Shirreffs, an Everglades Foundation policy adviser. "Now we're seeing big moving pieces."

This story was originally published January 10, 2016 at 12:00 AM with the headline "Environmentalists demand $200M be spent on voter concerns ."