Florida Republicans took off the gloves Tuesday in the one and only public hearing to discuss the redistricting map, accusing the Florida Supreme Court of “embedding” a map drawn by Democratic “partisan operatives” into their ruling and suggesting that if they adopt the court’s recommendations, they “investigate” the people who filed the lawsuit that forced the redrawn map.
“How does the court come in here to run roughshod over the legislature?” asked Sen. Tom Lee, R-Brandon, adding that the process has caused him “heartburn.”
Stung by the court ruling that ordered that eight congressional districts be drawn because the map was “tainted by improper partisan intent,’’ the legislature’s lawyers spent the morning advising that legislators had no choice but to adopt a map proposed that creates an east-west district across north Florida that would favor the election of a black to Congress.
George Meros, lawyer for the House, and former Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero, lawyer for the Senate, specifically suggested they adopt the alternative Congressional District 5, proposed by the League of Women Voters and Common Cause, two of the plaintiffs who sued lawmakers. The district now stretches from Jacksonville to north of Orlando and is held by U.S. Rep. Corrine Brown, R-Jacksonville.
“We believe the most prudent thing to do is to have that as a safe harbor and have the east-west configuration in there,’’ Meros said, adding he “believes that the east-west configuration of CD5 is required.”
Meros and Cantero were the lead lawyers advising the House and Senate in the maps court twice determined were flawed.
They emphasized Tuesday that the court appeared to expect the Legislature to adopt the maps proposed by the plaintiffs despite the fact that evidence showed that plaintiffs consulted with Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, the Democratic leader in the U.S. House.
“We’re pretty sure where they came from and the court told the court in our brief,’’ Cantero told legislators. “the court didn’t seem to care.”
Sen. Rob Bradley, R-Fleming Island, raised concerns that the court was operating in a partisan manner, as they were accused of doing.
“If the Florida Supreme Court is basically drawing a map and they know that the map was drawn by partisan Democratic operativeshow are the justices complying with the constitution,’’ he asked.
Cantero replied: “That is above my paygrade” and added that since he is likely to be one lawyers defending the next map before the court, “I don’t want to make them mad.”
Rep. Charles McBurney, R-Jacksonville, suggested that if they adopt the east-west district for CD5, they should "investigate" the plaintiffs and "inquire if there was intent to favor or disfavor an incum or political party." Meros agreed that would be appropriate.