By SALLY BUZBEE
Associated Press Writer
CAIRO — Iran’s Islamic regime has survived a devastating war with Iraq, strong American sanctions and international isolation in its 30 years of power.
It has seen reformist and hard-line presidents come and go, with barely a flinch.
Never miss a local story.
But now, public anger over the disputed election has given Iran’s ruling elite a challenge of a new and unsettling kind: A growing opposition movement with apparent broad backing, headed by a leader who is one of their own — and doesn’t seem intimidated.
Iran’s clergy-guided system does not appear in immediate danger. But the ruling clerics are paying close attention to the street anger — the same popular unrest they harnessed themselves three decades ago to bring down the shah in their 1979 revolution.
There is a chance — just a chance — that the recent protests could transform into a serious, credible movement similar to an opposition party in another country, fundamentally changing a system now ruled by an all-powerful and untouchable theocracy.
There is also a chance, more likely, that to avoid such an outcome, the clerics will either jettison, or at minimum rein in and weaken, the president they have supported until now, hard-liner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
For that to happen, the protests would almost certainly need to be sustained, spread to other cities and most importantly, attract enough clerical support to create high-level rifts.
“No one is very sure where it will go next,” said Suzanne Maloney, an Iran expert at the Saban Center for Middle East Policy in Washington.
But she says: “They have forced the regime to take a step back.”
Despite that, the likelihood that Iran’s clergy-ruled system will undergo a radical change remains dim.
Many Iranians feel strong kinship with the revolution, its heirs and the system they created, and are reluctant to do anything that would trigger bloody upheaval again.
Ahmadinejad has broad support among the poor and pious, who also venerate the country’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Yet Ahmadinejad’s hard-line jousts with the West, his mishandling of the economy and, in particular, what many view as a blatant theft of the election, seem to be turning off growing segments of the middle class.
The recent protests are different from the country’s last unrest, student-led protests in 1999 that fizzled.
In particular, this go-round has attracted some of Iran’s middle class, the same group that changed a religious movement in 1979 into a strong revolutionary force.