Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH
Wires - News - Wire - Opinions - Wire

Published: Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009

Updated: Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009

Comments (0) |

Principles vs. progressivism Constitution being trampled in liberal makeover of country

- Commentary
Add to My Yahoo!
Bookmark and Share
Subscribe To Us
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

The health reform debate has sparked numerous questions about the cost and scope of government involvement in health care. But few members of Congress have bothered to ask what the Constitution has to say on the topic — even though they are sworn to uphold the principles articulated in that document.

One reporter dared to ask House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Oct. 22 where the Constitution grants Congress authority to require individuals to buy health insurance. An obviously annoyed Speaker Pelosi replied: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

It is a very serious matter indeed. The speaker’s vexed response reveals the extent to which many of America’s intellectual, cultural and political elites have blithely abandoned the principles of America’s founding. They see these principles as outdated if not outright defective, with little or no relevance to modern governance.

How — and why — did this come to be? It all began 100 years ago as an

intellectual project involving mostly of academics and writers. It evolved into a popular reform effort under the banner of “progressivism.” Today, it’s the foundation of modern liberalism.

It’s important to understand how deeply the progressive movement has transformed our politics and society — and where, if left unchecked, it will take us.

Progressive thinkers sought to “re-found” America according to ideas alien to Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton and Madison. Repudiating the Founders’ belief in the existence of self-evident truths, Progressives asserted that there are no truths, only relative values.

Similarly, they claimed, man enjoys no permanent rights endowed by God, only changing rights held at the indulgence of government. Thus, lacking eternal truths and rights, Americans must be governed by a “living” Constitution, one that endlessly “evolves” and “grows” with the times.

The Progressive Movement — first under a Republican president, Theodore Roosevelt, and then a Democratic one, Woodrow Wilson — set forth the platform of modern American liberalism:

Progress means a form of government able to engineer a better society, assuring equal outcomes and redistributing wealth. A distant, patronizing welfare state regulates more and more of our economy, politics and society.

President Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal and President Lyndon Johnson’s Great Society were grand steps toward achieving the progressive platform.

Today we see a new, more aggressive move in this direction. Progressives insist that the modern world is so complex and problematic, an activist government is required to manage political life and human affairs.

This new liberalism seeks to transform America’s constitutional structure of limited government into an increasingly powerful, centralized government focused on social reform.

The rise of the modern administrative state, the growth of bureaucracy at every level and the host of benefits the public has come to expect from government all undercut and pervert the American idea of self-government.

Disclaimer: Story comments are intended to provide a place for constructive dialog about issues and events in our community. Your input is encouraged and can make a positive difference. To achieve this, no obscenity, personal attacks, or racial slurs are tolerated. Users brought to our attention for violating our terms of use will be blocked from commenting permanently and without notice. Please help keep the comments on topic by flagging objectionable material and remember that children and young adults may be reading your comments. With freedom of speech comes the responsibility to be respectful of others.

 

Bradenton.com Fan Shop