Florida local governments, health groups fighting e-cigarette bill

Local governments and health groups fighting bill they say would end local regulation of tobacco sales

kmcgrory@miamiherald.comApril 8, 2014 

TALLAHASSEE -- A bill seeking to ban the sale of e-cigarettes to minors has attracted some unlikely opponents: the American Cancer Society, the American Lung Association and the American Heart Association.

The anti-smoking organizations weren't always lined up against the proposal. But they became outraged when state lawmakers added language that would go farther, stripping local governments' ability to regulate the sale of e-cigarettes and tobacco products.

"This bill is another attempt by Big Tobacco to weaken protections we all seek to keep electronic smoking devices and tobacco out of the hands of our kids," said Brenda Olsen, the chief operating officer for the American Lung Association in Florida.

Rep. Frank Artiles, R-Miami, who is sponsoring the bill with Rep. Ronald Renuart, R-Ponte Vedra Beach, said the bill was not intended to loosen the laws.

"We are trying to have uniformity throughout the state of Florida," Artiles said Monday, adding that his bill incorporates some of the most

stringent controls on e-cigarette sales in the state.

Still, he faces a challenging road ahead, especially with the new opposition.

E-cigarettes are battery-operated devices that turn liquid nicotine into an odorless vapor. The act of inhaling is known as "vaping." Unlike traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes do not contain tobacco. But critics say they can be just as dangerous, depending on what chemicals are in the nicotine.

Their popularity has soared in recent years, with vape shops springing up across the state.

Teenagers are helping drive sales. The national Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently found that the number of middle and high school students using e-cigarettes doubled from 2011 to 2012.

Earlier this year, the state Senate passed a bill (SB 224) prohibiting e-cigarettes from being sold to minors without restricting the power of local governments.

The House version (HB 169) did not include the language taking away local governments' rights to regulate the sale of e-cigarettes and tobacco products when it was first filed in October. That provision was added during a committee hearing last month.

Artiles said the provision was needed because several Florida municipalities -- including Weston, Sunrise and Lighthouse Point -- had begun enacting their own e-cigarette ordinances.

"We cannot have 415 cities and 67 counties having different types of e-cigarettes laws," he said.

As the bill moved through the Legislature, Artiles also added new, more stringent restrictions on e-cigarette sales including one requiring the devices and other electronic nicotine dispensers to be kept behind the counter in convenience stores.

Local governments and anti-smoking groups, however, were focused on the preemption language -- and its potential to override existing municipal ordinances.

Compounding their concern: the language applies to the sale of all tobacco products, not just electronic cigarettes. While only handful of local governments have ordinances restricting the sales or use of electronic cigarettes, dozens have ordinances regarding the sale of tobacco products.

Florida Association of Counties President Bryan Desloge said municipalities should retain that authority.

"The form of government closest to the people is the government that knows what's best," Desloge said. "We would like to continue to be able to govern locally."

On Monday, Artiles said he would consider allowing existing tobacco sales ordinances to be grandfathered into the law.

Bradenton Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service