Verizon wins appeal against FCC's open-Internet regulations

Bloomberg NewsJanuary 15, 2014 

WASHINGTON -- Verizon Communications Tuesday won its challenge to U.S. open-Internet rules as an appeals court said the Federal Communications Commission overreached in barring broadband providers from slowing or blocking selected Web traffic.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington sent the rules back to the FCC, which may attempt to rewrite them.

The rules required companies that provide high-speed Internet service over wires to treat all traffic equally. With the regulation voided, companies such as Netflix and Amazon.com could face new charges for the fastest connections.

U.S. Circuit Judge David Tatel wrote for a three-judge panel that FCC tried to regulate Verizon and other broadband companies under the wrong legal framework.

"Given that the commission has chosen to classify broadband providers in a manner that exempts them from treatment as common carriers, the Communications Act expressly prohibits the commission from nonetheless regulating them as such," Tatel wrote.

The FCC will consider appealing Tuesday's decision, Chairman Tom Wheeler said in an emailed statement.

The agency will ensure "that these networks on which the Internet depends continue to provide a free and open platform for innovation and expression," Wheeler, a Democrat, said.

The FCC rule, approved on a Democratic-led 3-to-2 vote in 2010, left more freedom for wireless providers.

The rule attracted criticism from the left and right ends of the political spectrum. Open-Internet advocates said it didn't go far enough, and cited the lighter regulation of increasingly popular mobile services. Republicans, including members of Congress, called the rule an unjustified power grab.

The FCC passed the rule

after the appeals court decided the agency lacked authority to censure Comcast Corp. for interfering with subscribers' Internet traffic. That sent the FCC on a search for a legal justification, and the agency concluded it could rely on its broad power over communications.

Whether that foundation was adequate was a primary question in the case decided Tuesday by a three-judge panel that included circuit judges Laurence Silberman and Judith Rogers.

Proponents, including Web companies, say regulations are needed to keep Internet-service providers from interfering with rival video and other services. Those companies don't pay today for what's known as last-mile Web content delivery.

The FCC has said that without rules, Internet providers could favor wealthier, established players at the expense of startups, squelching innovation.

Bradenton Herald is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service